Blog

The thoughts and views of the team of peace builders here at the Peace Centre
Christchurch attack

Comment from our CEO: Christchurch attack

Waking up this morning (Friday 15th March 2019), many of us share in the horror unfolding in Christchurch, New Zealand.  People coming together to practice...

Waking up this morning (Friday 15th March 2019), many of us share in the horror unfolding in Christchurch, New Zealand.  People coming together to practice their faith have had their lives taken away or changed forever by the murderous acts of a few individuals who believe that extreme violence against their fellow human beings is justified.  To reflect on the words of New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, it is the darkest of days. Violent conflict is an ever present reality. In my job, as Chief Executive of the Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Peace Foundation, a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) that stands for peace and is a leading specialist in the prevention, resolution and response to violent conflict, I receive daily reports of terrorism incidents around the world. A global issue I meet many people affected by such acts.  Last week I was in Madrid, my visit coinciding with the 15th anniversary of the attacks on that city.  I met with the Director and Deputy Director General at the Support to Victims of Terrorism unit at the Spanish Ministry of Interior.  It was a privilege to attend the opening of an exhibition “Vivir sin miedo. Vivir con memoria”, by the Asociación de Víctimas del Terrorismo, translated as Living without fear / Living with memory. Members of my team traveled to Brussels with British survivors of incidents in Paris, London Westminster and Manchester.  They stood in solidarity with our European friends as the EU commemorated the annual day of remembrance for victims of terrorism.  This week, I was a guest of the Portugese Security and Intelligence Services in Lisbon alongside Police from Finland (Turku 2017), France (Paris 2015) and emergency responders (Barcelona 2017).  I was alongside a mother who lost her son to the warped ideologies of Daesh. Next week, I will visit Northern Ireland to promote continued reconciliation on our islands and attend commemorations of anniversaries including the Warrington bombing and the London Westminster attack.  Like the Founders of the Peace Foundation, Colin and Wendy Parry, everyone I met, from far and wide, has the same aim. Nobody should ever go through this sort of event again and that we must work to end violent conflict. Violence sets the tone for hatred Those who use violence, as we've seen in Christchurch this morning, do so to create division, hatred, fear and terror.  They use very stark, brutal and horrific methods to do this and they do so to create a reaction.  Their methods and communication is binary.  It is about 'us and 'them' and about creating 'the other' - it sets people apart, drives division and sets the tone for hatred.  The vast majority of people are immune to this, but our media and politicians are not, and often their response is in rhetoric and simplistic solutions driven by 'knee-jerk' and emotional reactions. Already today, in response to the events in Christchurch, there are numerous people 'parachuting in' with unchecked, and at time, odious opinion.  I have heard and seen some...

THINK project Peace Foundation

THINK Project: Cleaning the Bridge

When groups of young people as part of our THINK project come to The Peace Centre, we try (weather and time permitting), to take them...

When groups of young people as part of our THINK project come to The Peace Centre, we try (weather and time permitting), to take them to the Bridge Street memorial. This always proves to be significant and moving. March 1993 comes that much closer; no longer told about, but witnessed, touched and heard. I have over the years heard comments like “it’s a bit like where I live”, or “I can’t believe something like that happened here”. People walking past going about their daily business, the chatter and bustle prove that Warrington was and is an ordinary town. A town though where something extraordinary happened, something brutal and painful, but this pain need not shape everything. Instead something useful, hopeful and permanent can emerge from un-predicted and undeserved horror. Remembering the bombs The Sculpture and the River of Life in Warrington town centre are pleasing, calming, and sobering. Sometimes the most boisterous of groups find themselves silenced when standing close to where the bombs went off. The bronze sculpture, the faces and the flow and trickle of water offers strong, sturdy and unspoken hope. One time with a group from Swindon, a woman came over and proudly announced that her son had made one of the hand imprints, “he’s a bit bigger now though, probably wouldn’t fit”. Life goes on and people grow, and all the better when we do not meet violence with the same, when we make spaces for people to be together, and to feel peace. One route to town takes us over the white concrete Bridge near the centre. It is often useful to point out the expansion joints; the flexible parts of a bridge that prevent cracking and destruction during changes of temperature. Flexibility is essential in times of adversity, in conflict options are better than rigid dogma. The white smooth surfaces of the bridge have also, unfortunately served as a canvas for some with less flexible mindsets. Messages of division Earlier in the year we took a Group from Cedar Mount Academy across the bridge and saw that a range of hate statements had been scrawled and sprayed on the paintwork. Ugly, unpleasant rhetoric all punctuated with hastily drawn swastikas. The daubings were rushed, haphazard and amateur, but no less worrisome or offensive. The impact was visible and audible, here in plain view was the contradiction of all we had been cultivating at The Peace Centre. This group was, I think it is fair to say, normally the very opposite of quiet, but disbelief stunned them into silence. How could this be? There was anger and distress, but this was not expressed in the form of retaliation, instead there was puzzlement. “Why hasn’t it been cleaned off?". And then, “Maybe we could clean it”.  The seed was planted, and a decision made, and after a chat with Steve the maintenance man, we were equipped with some emery paper and determination. The next day over half of the group spent time scrubbing and rubbing away...

Supporting victims of terror: The SENSE model

In the aftermath of a terrorist incident, there is often confusion amongst front-line professionals and those who have been affected as to when and how...

In the aftermath of a terrorist incident, there is often confusion amongst front-line professionals and those who have been affected as to when and how to provide social support to victims of terror, and when a referral to clinical services should be made. This confusion may lead to variation in the care and support that is offered to those who have been affected, depending on their location and the organisations and professionals they encounter following the incident. Reinforcing Resilience Encouragingly, there is evidence emerging from experts in the field who suggest that the rates of post-traumatic stress disorder amongst victims of terror is no higher than those who are affected by other traumatic events. These same experts urge that a shift in focus is required, from an emphasis on vulnerability to reinforcing the resilience of those affected; rather than assuming high levels of trauma we should recognise the potential for coping, adjustment and recovery. Introducing SENSE At the same time, the National Institute of Clinical Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recognises the need for the ‘active monitoring’ of symptoms and for early referral to mental health services should symptoms worsen or not improve within a four to six-week watchful waiting period. Drawing on the recommendations of the NICE guidelines and the growing literature on trauma-informed practice, the SENSE model was established in response to the Manchester Arena attack in May 2017.  It provides a framework for social support in the immediate aftermath of a terror incident and over the longer term, and is referenced by our survivors assistance network in their support of victims and survivors. The model comprises of five key interventions in working with victims: Stabilisation Education Normalisation Social support Engagement The order of the letters in creating the word ‘sense’, also reflect the chronology in which the interventions should be offered. The five interventions focus on addressing the immediate practical and emotional needs of those affected and providing education and information to enable and empower people to monitor their own symptoms (or those of their family members). The next stage is to reassure victims and survivors that their experiences in the immediate aftermath are entirely normal, to reduce any sense of panic or feelings of distress. In addition, the model seeks to encourage the rallying of a person’s wider social support networks in recognition of the key role that friends and family will play in a person’s recovery. The final stage, ‘engagement’ is focused on facilitating the early referral to specialist support services (such as mental health services) as part of the ongoing process of active monitoring.  This would be initiated after the watchful waiting period has passed and the first four interventions have been offered to enable a focus on resilience, building strengths and supporting coping in the first instance. Clarity Empowers The increasing attention which has been paid to mental health and psychological wellbeing following an incident of terror may cause confusion and panic amongst survivors, their families and front-line professionals about if, when and...

Preventing violent extremism is all about fairness

Another day, another article about the Prevent strand of the Government’s counter terrorism strategy, CONTEST. In his commentary (published in the Conversation 18th December 2018),...

Another day, another article about the Prevent strand of the Government’s counter terrorism strategy, CONTEST. In his commentary (published in the Conversation 18th December 2018), Julian Hargreaves, Research Fellow at the Woolf Institute and Research Associate at St Edmund's College, University of Cambridge concludes that Prevent remains unfair on British Muslims, despite Home Office efforts. Such a conclusion is not new and is often used by detractors of Prevent who sway from the lazy rhetoric trotting out words like ‘toxic brand’ through to others, like Julian, who take a more considered view.  Of course, repetition makes a fact seem more true or memorable, but we also know that “repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth” – the first rule of propaganda often attributed to the Nazi Joseph Goebbels.  This is known as the "illusion of truth" effect and perhaps poignant that an extreme right-wing violent extremist is associated with such a technique. The question for me is that the naysayers of Prevent are sometimes doing the same, when our energies really need to be on the end game and that is preventing violent extremism and tackling the causes. Julian sets out a fair critique and indeed points out that Prevent has become more transparent.  But the conclusion again fails to look at the whole picture. In his recent update on the number of live terror related investigations in the UK, head of national counterterror policing, Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu, told the Home Affairs Committee it numbered a record of 700.  He stated that Islamists and the far-right “feed each other.”  He said around 80 per cent of investigations by Police and MI5 were looking into Islamist inspired and 20 per cent “other”, including a “significant proportion from the right wing. “There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind that the two ideologies, both perverse, are feeding each other.” Neil Basu He also said: “The overriding threat to the UK remains from those inspired by Daesh and the resurgent al-Qaeda, but our operations reflect a much broader range of dangerous ideologies, including very disturbingly rising extreme right-wing activity.” He reported that 17 attacks had been foiled since 2017 – 13 Islamist (76%) and four far-right (24%). Prevent is a highly targeted strand of CONTEST, responding to risk and threat.  So, whilst Julian’s central point is valid and there may be ‘perceived’ unfairness, would these figures not suggest that the targeting is being driven by the evidence and that the real unfairness is created by the perpetrators. Behind this risk is a complex set of aspects that leads to such referrals. It is possible that public and public sector workers (the people who refer to Channel) are more afraid of Islamist extremism, or it is more visible, given the larger number of disrupted plots. It could be that the scale of those incidents that succeeded is more embedded in the collective psyche – ‘terrorism’ does what it says – it creates fear and generates a reaction.  Both the Manchester 2017 and...

By Mstyslav Chernov - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=45277301

Bataclan 3 years on: In our own words

by Tony Scott and Justine Merton-Scott My now wife, Justine, and I were among the British survivors lucky enough to escape the horror of the Bataclan...

by Tony Scott and Justine Merton-Scott My now wife, Justine, and I were among the British survivors lucky enough to escape the horror of the Bataclan as it was attacked by terrorists on November 13th, 2015. As the anniversary approaches, it’s not uncommon for some of us to be contacted by the media and we were approached recently to be interviewed for a piece about the 3rd anniversary of the Bataclan attack. We were reticent, to say the least, but felt it was important that it doesn’t slip from the public consciousness. It provided an opportunity to gain some exposure for The Nick Alexander Memorial Trust and the Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Peace Foundation’s #WordsMatter campaign, both of which are very relevant in the aftermath of the Paris, London and Manchester attacks. As with such pieces it falls on the journalist and the editor to determine the angle, what gets used and what gets cut to feed the author’s narrative within the column inches allocated. That’s how journalism works and we don’t have that much control over it; it is a free press after all. However, I felt, having read the draft, I wanted to pick up the pieces from the cutting room floor and write something from the horse’s mouth, as it were, and here it is… Revisiting that night I’ll start by revisiting that night, it still feels as clear as day. We’d gone to Paris as my birthday treat. Justine had booked it and bought the tickets to see the Eagles of Death Metal. My choice, not hers, as she likes to point out. It was to be a romantic weekend getaway with a gig at Le Bataclan and a bit of sight-seeing, a few glasses of wine and soaking up the ambience of Paris. Sounds perfect. We flew into Paris that morning and had time to do a little sightseeing before heading to the gig in the evening. We’d called at a bar not far from the venue for a couple of drinks before heading to the gig at Le Bataclan. On entry it was rammed, near on full capacity. We’d normally try and get down the front but it was way too busy. Justine’s a shade under five foot so we headed up to the balcony for a better view. A decision, with hindsight, that probably helped save our lives. What happened next is well documented so I’m going to gloss over it a bit. At around 9:45pm terrorists had entered the Bataclan and started shooting. We got caught in what is often referred to as a freeze, fight, flight instinct as the amygdala kicks in, dropping to the floor and taking cover behind the seats. Moments later we went from freeze to flight on Justine’s instinct. We crawled our way behind the seats through a door at the end of the balcony and then up through a skylight and onto the roof. It was a difficult reach, particularly for Justine. People were lifting each other...

If you don’t enjoy Bonfire Night, this may help

With Hallowe’en last night and Bonfire Night on 5th November just around the corner, this time of year is often especially challenging for people who,...

With Hallowe’en last night and Bonfire Night on 5th November just around the corner, this time of year is often especially challenging for people who, like many of the people our SAN team work with, have experienced an acute stress reaction or live with PTSD. It’s important to recognise that you or those around you might find the sudden bangs and flashes distressing and to consider how you are going to prepare for this period, or respond if something unexpected happens. There are a number of good advice resources available online to help you cope during this period, including this one from MIND. Many people find using ‘Grounding’ or ‘Mindfulness’ helpful. Grounding techniques can keep you in the here-and-now and help you avoid feelings, memories, flashbacks or intrusive thoughts that you don't feel able to cope with yet. They work by focussing on the sensations you are feeling right now: Listen to other sounds around you like birdsong, or music Notice the feel of your clothes against your body; the wind against your face and the ground beneath your feet; wrapping yourself in a blanket and feeling it around you Touch something or sniff something with a strong smell like perfume or something nice to eat You might find it helpful to keep a box of things with different textures and smells (for example perfume, a blanket and some smooth stones) ready for when you need it. Consider earphones for listening to music or noise-cancelling ones to minimise the sound. It might be helpful to plan for the coming period and to consider where you will be on Bonfire Night. It could be particularly helpful to mention to family and friends how you are feeling. In the worst-case scenario, consider having an emergency plan so that people know how best to help you. With luck, all of this will prove to be unnecessary, but please take care of yourselves during this noisy time. If you would like to speak to a member of the Survivors Assistance Network team at the Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Peace Foundation about this or anything else, please email us or ring 01925 581 240. (SAN is not a 24/7 service, but all voice messages and emails left out of office hours will be responded to the next working day. If your need is urgent, please ring 111 or 999 as appropriate). by Terry O'Hara - Survivors Assistance Network Manager

Blog: Sticks and stones can break your bones but…

Before you read this blog you need to make a decision. You need to decide whether you want to read an explicit statement made by...

Before you read this blog you need to make a decision. You need to decide whether you want to read an explicit statement made by a six-year-old boy. Because, as you will see, words can hurt and they do. A few weeks ago, a colleague from the Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Peace Foundation was delivering one of our programmes. During the programme she spent time talking with young children, those at key stage one, starting out on their education, how people are always different from each other. She showed some material that demonstrated this, where people had built physical walls to divide different communities. And, she asked the children what they would do if they met somebody who is different to them – that is someone who could be considered as the other. The answer a six-year-old boy gave was - and here you need to decide whether to read on or not and whether you can deal with the next statement - “I would blow their hand off with a grenade.” Just pause for a moment. Just reflect. This was a six-year-old, not in some inner-city school as stereotypes may dictate, but in a leafy suburb in a well-to-do area The lesson moved on to look at why and how such of a view was being formed and this may not surprise you. Our world of modern technology, including gaming and social media, and access to the World Wide Web, has brought unprecedented information to many people, including young children. When questioned further, we found another major surprise.  That is the number of children who are watching television programmes that we would normally class as being after the watershed. The fact that six-year-olds are watching programs like BBC’s Bodyguard, one of the biggest TV experiences of the year, and experiencing prolonged and explicit violence, including terrorism, aspects of violent extremism and simulated sex involving fictional senior politicians, is something we all need to pause and think about.  With so much information available, the sheer number of words and, often words that cause harm, that are reaching children is phenomenal. The ability of young children to absorb such information and words, the process them all, and apply critical thinking to deal with such material, is being sorely tested.  The impact on their knowledge and wisdom is not fully quantified, but for some could it be the start of a path that may lead to radicalisation and even violent extremism.  I refer you to the solution our six-year-old gave.  Playful naivety or something that could lead to something far more sinister? We, at the Peace Foundation, believe that words matter, and over the past few weeks we have been working with survivors of terror and violent conflict to understand the impact words used by the media and those in public life, has on them, and also the impact the words are having on those that may use violence to harm others. It is a frightening and daunting picture. And we have...